The review or purpose of an agreement is legal, unless the ordinary task of the courts is to defer to well-informed public policy chiefs and apply them to different situations. For example, A, the CEO of a company, agrees to award a contract to B if the latter pays rs 5,000 to the former. The agreement tends to create an interest against bonds and is non-hazard because of the trade in public functions. Example: A has agreed with T that he will buy his apartment for 40lac. Here is the view of A house and therefore T`s consideration is 40lac. In section 23 cases, it is necessary to examine or verify whether a convention on the ground of the objects is declared null or void. The three points above, viz. (i) The consideration of the agreement, (ii) the purpose of the agreement and (iii) the agreement must also be kept in mind and, therefore, the three principles that flow from the section – which are: although the purpose or reflection of an agreement, sometimes not directly prohibited by law, they are always prohibited, if it is natural, to refute the purpose of determining the law. The authorization of such an object or such consideration is void. If a decree-law provides for a sanction for an act or promise, the execution of such an act or promise would amount to the defeat of that law, because it is implied that the statute intends to prohibit that act. If the legality of the object is prohibited by law: the law is associated with the law means for the time being in india, and therefore Hindu and Mohammaden includes laws and also principles of unwritten law.  A mere figure is the death of unlicensed spirits, and the sale was considered unsted and the price irrevocably. 24. Nullity agreements when partially illegal considerations and rebuttals The California Court of Appeals for the Third District refused to execute a debt payment agreement used for the acquisition of the drug trafficking organization and other similar products. Although the items sold were not in fact illegal, the court refused to comply with the agreement on public policy grounds. Illegal counterpart and rebuttal: However, for the agreement to be declared illegal and not adaged because of fraudulent use or consideration, fraud must be unequivocally proven and cannot be based on mere suspicion and presumption. If the purpose or consideration of an agreement is unethical, it is cancelled. The following examples would help to better understand the point. Circumstances that would make a consideration illegal for consideration and the subject of an agreement are examined, as in each of these cases the review or purpose of an agreement is considered illegal. Any agreement whose purpose or consideration is illegal is void.  Sarma, B.V.R., Legitimate Objects and Considerations under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 – An analysis, page 3. One of the most important elements of a valid contract is that the parties must enter into a contract for a legitimate good. An agreement whose purpose is contrary to the law of the country may be either illegal or simply non-aeig, depending on the provisions of the law against which it opposes.  Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 makes certain considerations and objects considered illegal. “The consideration or purpose of an agreement is lawful, unless it is prohibited by law; or is of such that, if allowed, the provisions of a law would not fall; fraud; or involves the violation of someone else`s person; or the Court considers it immoral or contrary to public policy. The concept of public order in the broadest sense implies a restriction on the freedom of persons to do something in the best interests or for the good of the Community.